America Needs an Alternative to Prison :: Argument Argumentative

America Needs an Alternative to PrisonAmericas prisons have been called alum schools for crime. It stands to reason Take a group of people, strip them of possessions and privacy, expose them to uninterrupted threats of violence, overcrowd their cell- block, deprive them of meaningful work, and the result is an embittered underclass more endeavor on getting even with conjunction than contributing to it. Prisons take the unbloody wrongdoer and make him live by violence. They take the nonviolent offender and make him a hardened killer. America has to wake up and pull in that the current structure of our penal system is failing terribly. The organisation has to bone new ways to punish the guilty, and still manage to keep American citizens satisfied that our prison system is still effective. Americans pay a cracking deal for prisons to fail so badly. Like all big giving medication solutions, they are expensive. In the course of my studies dealing with the criminal justice system , I have learned that the government spends approximately eighty-thousand dollars to build one cell, and $28,000 per stratum to keep a prisoner locked up. Thats about the same as the greet of sending a student to Harvard. Because of overcrowding, it is estimated that more than ten-billion dollars in construction is undeniable to create sufficient space for just the current prison population. The manifestly truth is that the very nature of prison, no matter how humane society attempts to make it, produces an environment that is inevitably devastating to its residents. Even if their release is retard by longer sentences, those residents inevitably return to damage the community, and we are gainful top dollar to make this possible. Why should tax payers be constrained to pay amounts to keep nonviolent criminals sitting in prison cells where they go away bitter and more likely to repeat their offenses when they are released? Instead, why not put them to work outside prison where they could pay back the victims of their crimes? The government should initiate work programs where the criminal is given a barter and essential relinquish his or her earnings to the victim of their crime until the mental and corporal damages of their victims are sufficed. A court will determine how a lot money the criminal will have to pay for his restitution costs, and what job the criminal will have to do to pay back that restitution. The approximately obvious benefit of this approach is that it takes care of the victim, the forgotten person in the current system.