Lysistrata :: essays research papers

Lysistrata& international ampere8220There is no beast as shameless as a cleaning ladyAristophanes was a craft comedy poet in the fourth century B.C. during the time of the Peloponnesian War. Aristophanes&8217 usual flare was to be satirical, and suggesting the eccentric. The most absurd and humorous of Aristophanes&8217 comedies are those in which the main reference books, the heroes of the story, are wo custody. Smart women. One of the most famous of Aristophanes&8217 comedies portraying powerfully capable women is Lysistrata, named after the female lead character of the renovate. It depicts Athenian Lysistrata and the women of Athens teaming up with the women of Sparta to force their husbands to conclude the Peloponnesian War. The play is a comedy, which appears to be written for the amusement of men. The play can be seen as a historical reference to ancient Greece, that it seems super unlikely that women would talk with such(prenominal) a crude sexual tone. or else Lysistrata is strictly a satirical play written maybe even to make men doubt the innocence of a woman.If women were such beasts as Euripides stated then would women have managed to seize the Acropolis, and prevented the men from squandering them march on on the war. Euripides might have referred to the vulgarity of the women&8217s thoughts and terminology&8220It&8217s a sair thing, the dear knows, for a womantae sleep alone wi&8217oot a prick &8211 just now we maun doit, for the sake of peaceThe language of the women is, as mentioned earlier, strictly for the humor. For Euripides to make such a quote seems rather incorrect. It is to a certain extent the men who are the shameless beasts who beat their wives and fight senseless wars.      Lysistrata, on the opposition shows women acting bravely and even aggressively against men who seem headstrong on ruining the city- state by prolonging a pointless and overly expending reserves stored in the Acropolis. The men being away at war would come home when they could, sexually relieve them selves and then relegate again to precede a meaningless war. The women challenge the masculine theatrical role model to preserve traditional way of life in the community. When the women perish challenged themselves they take on the masculine characteristics and defeat the men physically, mentally but primarily strategically. Proving that neither side benefits from it, just that one side loses more than than the other. It gives the impression that the women are heroes and the men are ignorant, which contradicts what Euripides said but is chiefly written to entertain.