Ethics can be defined as the sure criticism on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or improve those beliefs in some way. (Dodds, Lecture 2) Kantian moral scheme and Utilitarianism be two theories that attempt to answer the ethical constitution of kind-hearted beings. This paper allow for attempt to explain how and why Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism differ as well as discuss why I believe Kants theory provides a more plausible account of ethics. Immanuel Kants deonotological ethical theory assesses if serves ar moral based on the individuals will or purport of acting. Kants theory can be categorized as a deonotological because action at laws are not assessed to be morally permissible on the basis of consequences they produce, but rather on the form of the agents will in acting, (Dodds, Lecture 7) therefore his actions are based on duty and not consequential. Kantianism is based on three beliefs: maxims, willing, and the categoric imperative . Kant states that a maxim is a general rule or article of faith which will explain what a someone takes himself to be doing and the circumstances in which he takes himself to be doing it (Feldman, 1999, 201).
It is important that this principle be universalisable and that the maxim can be applied systematically to everyone that encounters similar situations, therefore willed as a universal law. The abet aspect of Kants theory is willing. This involves the agent consistently committing oneself to make an action occur. He states that, In general, we can say that a person wills inconsistently if he wills that p be the che mise and he wills that q be the fount and i! ts impossible for p and q to be the case together (Feldman, 1999, 203). The last aspect of Kants theory is the categorical imperative. The wideness of the categorical... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment